Standards

Editorial Policy & Corrections

No Picks is a boxing intelligence publication. We do not publish betting picks or fight predictions. We would rather be right than first.

What our labels mean

  • verified

    Confirmed through authoritative reporting, official records, commissions, promoters acting as primary sources, governing bodies, or multiple credible independent sources.

  • reported

    Reported by a credible source but not independently confirmed by No Picks.

  • breaking

    New information developing quickly. Details may change.

  • developing

    An active story where evidence is still arriving and the record is being updated.

  • disputed

    Credible conflicting information exists. We show both sides rather than pick one.

  • official

    Taken from an official record: a commission filing, sanctioning body, venue or broadcaster statement.

  • estimated

    An estimate, always labelled as such. We never convert an estimate into an official figure.

Sourcing standards

A social-media claim is never automatically converted into a fact. Trusted sources are selected manually by an administrator; no automated system may add a source to our monitored list. Promoter and fighter statements are recorded as sources but are not treated as independent verification of their own commercial claims. Official commission and sanctioning-body records outrank all other sourcing. Where a figure is not publicly available, we display "Not publicly reported". We do not fill gaps with estimates unless the estimate is explicitly labelled ESTIMATED. We never manufacture quotes and never invent numbers.

How AI is used

AI assists with collection, relevance filtering, entity extraction, story clustering, historical comparison and first drafts. AI output is always a draft or a recommendation. AI output never overrides an editor's verification decision, and no AI confidence score alone can promote a claim to VERIFIED.
How we score confidence →

When a story publishes automatically

A narrow class of routine, well-sourced items publishes automatically inside the same ten-minute cycle in which it is collected. Every automatic decision is logged with the exact criteria it met, is labelled in our editorial system, and can be unpublished, corrected or retracted by an editor at any time. Automatic publication never confers VERIFIED status — that still requires official evidence or genuinely independent corroboration reviewed by a person. WIRE items publish automatically only when all of the following are true: · at least 2 genuinely independent sources · no conflict detected between those sources · confidence band MODERATE or HIGH · all fighters and events resolved with no outstanding ambiguity · the subject is outside our sensitive-judgment list BUZZING items are single-source by design, so they are gated on source quality instead of count: · the originating account is a Tier 1 primary source · no conflict detected · the item is not one monitored account disputing another — adjudicating a disagreement between sources always stays with an editor · the subject is outside our sensitive-judgment list The sensitive-judgment list — always human-reviewed, regardless of source count: allegations and accusations against a named person, disputes, injury and medical claims, legal, criminal, commission and sanctioning rulings, doping and failed-test claims, investigations, and anything involving a minor. Volume safeguard: if more than 10 items qualify in a single ten-minute cycle, nothing publishes automatically. A burst that size is more likely a pipeline anomaly than ten genuine independent stories, so the whole batch is held for an editor. This rule applies only to items collected after it took effect. Nothing already in the editorial queue was retroactively published.

Corrections

When a published figure or claim turns out to be wrong, we correct the record in place and note what changed and when. Intelligence items keep their full development timeline, so readers can see how a story moved from REPORTED to VERIFIED, or to DISPUTED. To request a correction, contact the editorial desk with the item, the disputed figure and the supporting documentation.